Definitions / Glossary
Institutional Tension Index (ITI)
In Fiscal Geometry, ITI is not a distinction between budgeted (planned) data and actual (realized) data.
The distinction within ITI occurs within the same set of interaction records.
Arithmetic ITI and Geometric ITI are two analytical readings of the same dataset:
Arithmetic ITI aggregates the same interaction records using scalar rules to produce a numerical measure of institutional tension.
Geometric ITI maps the same interaction records onto the X–Y fiscal plane, expressing tension through spatial structure, shape, density, and clustering.
Accordingly, Arithmetic ITI ≠ planned/budget and Geometric ITI ≠ realized/actual.
The difference between them represents a resolution shift (how the same data are read), not a data-source split.
White Paper - Structural Fiscalistics and the Governance of Admissible Reality in AI Systems WP 2.0
White Paper - Structural Fiscalistics in the AI Era Integrating Fiscal Epistemology (FE) and Fiscal Geometry (FG)
White Paper - Fiscal Geometry Protocol 1.0: A Representation Schema for AI-Assisted Audits
White Paper - Fiscal Geometry in Regulatory Workflows: A Neutral, Reusable Structural Grammar for Representation
White Paper - Fiscal Geometry in Professional Services — a neutral, reusable interface for structural visibility.
Featured Technical Note
Sectional Reading under the Fiscal Geometry Framework: Computing SITI and Interpreting SIDI on the X–Y Plane
Technical Note · Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/records/18005312
ITI / IDI — Same Dataset, Two Readings.
Arithmetic ITI = scalar aggregation; Geometric ITI = XY computation on the dominant cloud; IDI = controlled difference.
Fiscal Geometry as a Neutral Analytical Interface: An Upstream Specification for Structural Visibility Prior to Analysis
Technical Note · Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/records/18018506
Fiscal Geometry: A Technical White Paper on Representational Infrastructure for AI-Assisted Institutional Analysis
Technical Note · Zenodo
This unified white paper presents a consolidated overview of the Two-Axis Fiscal Framework and Fiscal Event Geometry. It explains how cross-jurisdictional flows and intergenerational capital positions jointly structure institutional movement and produce observable fiscal patterns.
This white paper outlines the conceptual architecture of Fiscal Event Geometry as a coordinate-based approach for representing how tax, migration, education, and wealth systems jointly generate observable events across institutional spaces.